Sunday, May 20, 2007

 

it's come to my attention that i have been making more mistakes recently. like naming the wrong person several times consecutively. looks like a bad sign that i'm getting messed up.

on the brighter side, joe's response was heartwarming. at least he's considering. so i have one less person to convince.

i'm sorry but if you guys wanted me to put that as my top priority, i doubt i will. it wouldnt be fair to my other responsibilities, so you can only have as much priority as everyone else. it's not like you had given this any higher priority than your other commitments, and besides, it's not justifiable.

i feel like calling a final meeting. then we can really argue liao. it seems like there is a chance of us meeting up in full strength, as opposed to what i believed. but whether people want to meet up, that is a different issue. it would be a great time to review what we have discussed and see if any body really had anything to say. cos i'm really of the view that no one is bothering with my mails. even when the mail contains changes to fundamental operating principles, it was reduced to "guidelines". maybe i should rephrase, one meeting might not be enough. if EnD took 3 hours to work through what i had to say, i would estimate a good 5 hours, esp if we include concert preparation. I must make it a point not to include performance group discussions since it strictly involves a different group of people.

Zhengyu wrote at 3:49 AM.